Definitions
In plain terms
Too few supporting pivots produce no fit instead of false precision.
Technical
Return unavailable when the winning consensus has fewer than min_inliers, with the selected default requiring at least three.
Scope
A line through two points alone is not accepted as a robust consensus result.
Examples
- A reviewer computes Minimum Inlier Rule on a small deterministic fixture and checks timing, units, and boundary behavior before publication.
Common misconceptions
- A line through two points alone is not accepted as a robust consensus result.
Concept relationships
Where this concept is used
Tutorials planned
These catalogued topics use this concept, but their complete build has not shipped yet.
- D08-F01-A04 Important
Evidence and governance
- Random Sample Consensus: A Paradigm for Model Fitting Fischler and Bolles · first party technical publication
Supports: preferred label, short definition, technical definition
Limits: The original applications are image analysis and cartography, not financial trendlines.
- sklearn.linear_model.RANSACRegressor scikit-learn · first party technical publication
Supports: preferred label, short definition, technical definition
Limits: This package enumerates every two-point hypothesis for small pivot sets instead of using random sampling.
- Linear Least Squares Regression NIST/SEMATECH · official standard
Supports: preferred label, short definition, technical definition
Limits: A fitted line remains descriptive and is not evidence of a future price path.
- numpy.log NumPy · first party technical publication
Supports: preferred label, short definition, technical definition
Limits: A log transform requires positive finite prices and does not by itself define a financial level.
- numpy.polyfit NumPy · first party technical publication
Supports: preferred label, short definition, technical definition
Limits: The glossary freezes its own log-space OLS contract, diagnostics, and tie rules.
- Reviewed by
- fintech-builder-batch-011
- Last reviewed
- 2026-08-09
- Next review
- 2027-08-09
- Record status
- evidence reviewed
This record is evidence-reviewed and readable, but not yet promoted to published — it is served noindex,follow and excluded from the sitemap.
