Resolve duplicate evidence groups with a transparent cap and flag within-group disagreement instead of allowing repeated signals to dominate.
The decision this tutorial makes visible
Cross-Model Conflict and Double-Counting Resolver matters because an integrated stock screen is only useful when every input, peer, model variant, weight, and abstention reason can be audited at the same knowledge timestamp.
The precise question is: How can correlated evidence be capped and conflicting model views be surfaced before a final score?
A practitioner needs to know what the diagnostic does and does not justify. A builder needs a contract that can be reproduced from the same point-in-time inputs in Python, TypeScript, a visual, and a browser lab.
Intuition before notation
The resolver changes influence, not facts. It prevents three variants of the same liquidity evidence from counting as three independent pillars while preserving a conflict ledger.
The result depends on the declared algorithm scope, input clocks, units, equality and rounding policies, and unsupported-state treatment. Change one of those and the output represents a different decision even when its field name is unchanged.
Scope and nearby methods
Components are 0–100 safety scores with positive weights and an evidence_group. Each group's total weight is capped at 0.40, and a score range at or above 30 points flags conflict; group means are then normalized by capped weights.
| Variant | Definition | Best use | Main limitation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Evidence-group cap | Cap repeated group weight and flag range | Explainable multi-model composites | Grouping requires judgment |
| Correlation-matrix shrinkage | Estimate pairwise dependence and shrink weights | Quantitative research | Harder to audit |
| No resolver | Sum every component independently | Simple prototype | Double-counting risk |
What is sourced, selected, synthetic, and derived
| Role | Material claim | Evidence | Boundary |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sourced fact | The named accounting, statistical, or historical model context is limited to the cited source role. | Altman (1968) | The source does not validate the synthetic fixture or current calibration. |
| Author-derived calculation | g_g=Σw·s/Σw; c_g=min(Σw,0.40); R=Σc_g·g_g/Σc_g | canonical-input.json, expected-output.json, and independent arithmetic | Synthetic teaching record under this package contract. |
| Implementation choice | Weights, caps, thresholds, peer rules, and abstention gates are explicit package choices. | Frozen definition contract and data contract | Not a universal rating, probability, or investment conclusion. |
The authoritative sources support only the exact facts named in the claim ledger. They do not certify the synthetic numbers in this tutorial. The repository fixture is deliberately invented for auditability, and the displayed output is author-derived under the selected implementation choice.
Formula, symbols, and numerical policy
g_g=Σw·s/Σw; c_g=min(Σw,0.40); R=Σc_g·g_g/Σc_g
| Symbol | Meaning | Unit | Policy |
|---|---|---|---|
| g_g | group mean | 0..100 | Weight within group |
| c_g | capped group weight | share | min(raw, cap) |
| R | resolved score | 0..100 | Capped group mean |
- Use full floating-point precision and round only for display.
- Scores are bounded to 0–100 only where the input contract explicitly says so.
- Reject missing, nonfinite, malformed, mixed-period, unsupported, and contradictory records rather than manufacturing defaults.
- Keep the raw components, weights, thresholds, clock, and diagnostic state with every result.
Read the formula in the same order as the algorithm. Validate identity, ordering, units, and supported state first. Apply the selected equality and window rules second. Calculate with unrounded numeric values. Round only at the declared presentation boundary, and preserve null as a diagnostic rather than coercing it to zero.
Build the algorithm
- Validate component scores, weights, group labels, cap, and conflict threshold.
- Calculate each group's weighted mean and score range.
- Cap group weight and flag ranges at or above the threshold.
- Normalize capped contributions into resolved_score.
Production-minded operational checklist
- Freeze the knowledge cutoff and source ownership
- Resolve population and model applicability before calculating
- Retain components, weights, and evidence coverage beside the headline
- Abstain or route when the contract is not satisfied
Stop when a source clock, peer membership, model population, weight, or missing-data rule is unavailable; do not silently complete the score.
Worked synthetic example
The canonical fixture is synthetic teaching data, not an observed control
event, filing fact, or portfolio decision. Its primary author-derived output,
resolved_score, is three evidence groups, capped liquidity weight, and resolved_score = 70.667. The complete input and output
are in datasets/canonical-input.json and datasets/expected-output.json.
Liquidity receives a 0.40 cap, quality receives a 0.25 weight with a 25-point range, and resilience receives 0.20. The result displays both the raw weighted score and the capped resolved score so the adjustment is inspectable.
Counterfactual checkpoint
One-driver integration stress. Move one declared input or rule boundary while holding the remaining synthetic record fixed. The output changes because the visible component or gate changes, not through an unexplained hidden adjustment.
The structured result retains state and diagnostics in addition to the primary number. That makes the calculation independently reviewable and prevents a incomplete, rejected, or abstained score state from being mistaken for an unqualified value.
Boundary and counterexample workbook
The playground computes every scenario at 61 deterministic parameter states.
The table uses the declared focus step and states whether that focus reproduces
the canonical fixture. The full state ledger and compressed transition
segments are in datasets/scenario-results.json.
| Scenario | Review focus | Purpose | State | Primary output | Diagnostic | Decision segments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Canonical evidence groups | Step 0 · canonical fixture | Driver: liquidity group. Move a liquidity component. Predict first: Will repeated liquidity evidence be capped? | resolved | 69.64/100 | 0 conflict groups | 2 |
| Quality conflict | Step 30 · comparison focus | Driver: quality score range. Separate quality component scores. Predict first: Will a 30-point spread flag conflict? | conflict-detected | 66.14/100 | 1 conflict groups | 2 |
| Group cap | Step 30 · comparison focus | Driver: group_cap. Lower the group cap. Predict first: How does a smaller cap reduce double-counting? | resolved | 70.00/100 | 0 conflict groups | 1 |
| Threshold equality | Step 30 · comparison focus | Driver: conflict_threshold. Move the threshold to a group range. Predict first: Does equality at the threshold flag conflict? | conflict-detected | 69.64/100 | 1 conflict groups | 2 |
| Independent evidence | Step 30 · comparison focus | Driver: new evidence group. Stress the resilience group. Predict first: What happens when a distinct group is added? | resolved | 64.24/100 | 0 conflict groups | 1 |
| Raw versus resolved | Step 30 · comparison focus | Driver: liquidity duplication. Increase repeated liquidity weight. Predict first: Why can resolved differ from raw? | resolved | 69.10/100 | 0 conflict groups | 1 |
| No conflict | Step 30 · comparison focus | Driver: quality scores. Bring quality components together. Predict first: What does a resolved group look like? | resolved | 72.14/100 | 0 conflict groups | 1 |
These rows are not backtest observations. They are controlled counterexamples that expose how one driver changes the state, output, or reason code while the rest of the contract stays fixed.
Visualize the boundary
Open this SVG at full size, or use the guided playground to compare the seven topic-specific canonical, boundary, policy, and failure scenarios.
The Mermaid flow answers where the selected calculation sits in the processing sequence. The SVG keeps the formula, output, decision boundary, and invariant visible together. The lab lets the reader step through the same structured states without changing the underlying definition.
Implementation walkthrough
The Python and TypeScript references begin with the same validation contract, reject malformed and unsupported state before calculation, preserve declared ordering and rounding policies, and return structured diagnostics rather than one context-free number.
The main implementation branches are:
- group range >= threshold — flag conflict, because models disagree materially.
- raw group weight > cap — cap and disclose, because repeated evidence would dominate.
- all groups resolved — pass adjusted score, because no unresolved overlap remains.
Neither reference silently fetches data, mutates caller-owned inputs outside the declared engine behavior, guesses hidden state, or substitutes a provider default. Shared JSON fixtures make value, null, state, and reason-code drift visible across languages.
Testing and validation
Definition tests compare every canonical field, reject malformed state, and exercise the material boundary. Family validation recomputes every playground state from the reference function. Independent arithmetic is recorded beside the fixture rather than inferred only from implementation output.
The audit must preserve these invariants:
- Each group contributes at most group_cap weight before renormalization.
- Conflict groups are declared when range ≥ threshold.
- The score remains between the minimum and maximum group mean.
- Retain the method identifier, source clock, intermediate components, and final diagnostic beside the headline.
Passing the tests proves the frozen assembly, routing, arithmetic, and parity contract. It does not validate live-market performance or a current issuer decision.
Failure modes and misuse
- A transparent composite remains dependent on the source models, population, weights, peer set, and accounting mapping.
- A high or low score is a research-screen state, not a rating, audit conclusion, fraud finding, default forecast, or investment recommendation.
- Implementation fidelity does not establish current-population calibration, causality, predictive accuracy, or profitability.
Debugging order
When a result looks surprising, inspect the state in this order:
- Confirm the as-of and revision clock.
- Confirm the eligible population and selected model variant.
- Confirm units, signs, peer direction, weights, caps, and thresholds.
- Reconcile every component and abstention reason before interpreting the headline.
Evidence and historical boundary
Historical decision: not useful. A named issuer case is not useful for the canonical orchestration arithmetic without a reproducible point-in-time filing bundle, peer-membership snapshot, model-population eligibility decision, adjustment basis, and redistribution permission. The family therefore uses clearly labeled synthetic records and cites the original model papers for definition history.
The primary sources are Altman (1968), Piotroski (2000), Beneish (1999), SEC statements guide, IFRS framework. They support the source roles listed in the research ledger, not a redistributable historical observation, a private participant decision, production conformance certification, execution-quality result, profitability claim, or prediction claim.
Summary and next topic
You can now calculate, audit, and bound Cross-Model Conflict and Double-Counting Resolver before continuing to Overall Explainable Stock Score. The learning flow is: Distress-Model Ensemble → Cross-Model Conflict and Double-Counting Resolver → Overall Explainable Stock Score. Carry the result forward only with its scope, clock, state, and evidence label.
Level 2 learning check
This additive check keeps the original calculation and example unchanged. Use the studio in four passes:
| Pass | Learner question | Evidence to inspect |
|---|---|---|
| Predict | How can correlated evidence be capped and conflicting model views be surfaced before a final score? | The active scenario prompt and driver |
| Inspect | What changed first? | group means, caps, ranges, and conflict flags |
| Reconcile | Can the visible intermediate explain the headline? | The component, route, peer, confidence, or migration ledger |
| Bound | Is the result safe to interpret? | group cap and score-range threshold and the evidence clock |
The output is a research-screen state, not a rating, audit conclusion, default forecast, fraud finding, or investment recommendation. Continue to Overall Explainable Stock Score only after retaining the scope, clock, state, and evidence label.
Integration visual atlas
Use the atlas to follow Assemble → Resolve → Normalize → Explain, then inspect the evidence clock and boundary map before interpreting the headline.
Use the integration studio
- Read the prediction prompt and name the expected direction before moving the driver.
- Compare the scenario base with the current state and changed-input summary.
- Reconcile the visible intermediate (group means, caps, ranges, and conflict flags) to the headline.
- Apply the boundary and evidence clock: group cap and score-range threshold.
Rendered from the canonical Mermaid sources linked by this article.
Cross-Model Conflict and Double-Counting Resolver calculation flow
This flow identifies the selected calculation stages and the structured output.
Takeaway: The resolver changes influence transparently; it never hides a disagreement.
ReferencesPrimary sources and evidence notesExpand the source trail, evidence role, and limitations behind the engineering choices.
Expand the source trail, evidence role, and limitations behind the engineering choices.
S1 — Financial Ratios, Discriminant Analysis and the Prediction of Corporate Bankruptcy
- Organization or authors: Edward I. Altman
- Source type: Original peer-reviewed paper
- Publication or effective date: 1968
- Version: Source edition or current web page
- URL or DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1968.tb00843.x
- Accessed: 2026-08-09
- Jurisdiction: U.S. publicly traded manufacturers
- Supports: Defines the original public-manufacturer five-factor screen reused only as a routed diagnostic input.
- Limitations: Original population and calibration do not transfer automatically to a current universe.
S2 — Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers
- Organization or authors: Joseph D. Piotroski
- Source type: Original peer-reviewed paper
- Publication or effective date: 2000
- Version: Source edition or current web page
- URL or DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2672906
- Accessed: 2026-08-09
- Jurisdiction: U.S. high-book-to-market firms
- Supports: Defines the original nine-signal F-Score research design.
- Limitations: The paper does not validate this family's composite weights, current calibration, or ranking usefulness.
S3 — The Detection of Earnings Manipulation
- Organization or authors: Messod D. Beneish
- Source type: Original peer-reviewed paper
- Publication or effective date: 1999
- Version: Source edition or current web page
- URL or DOI: https://doi.org/10.2469/faj.v55.n5.2296
- Accessed: 2026-08-09
- Jurisdiction: U.S. research sample
- Supports: Defines the eight-index manipulation screen that can inform a bounded quality component.
- Limitations: A screen is not a fraud finding and does not supply this family's composite calibration.
S4 — Beginners' Guide to Financial Statements
- Organization or authors: U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
- Source type: Official regulator publication
- Publication or effective date: 2014-01-12
- Version: Source edition or current web page
- URL or DOI: https://www.sec.gov/about/reports-publications/beginners-guide-financial-statements
- Accessed: 2026-08-09
- Jurisdiction: United States public-company reporting
- Supports: Balance sheets show stocks at a fixed point while income and cash-flow statements describe periods; the statements must be read together.
- Limitations: It does not prescribe this family's scores, weights, peer rules, or current-company conclusion.
S5 — Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting
- Organization or authors: International Accounting Standards Board
- Source type: Official accounting framework
- Publication or effective date: 2021 issued compilation
- Version: Source edition or current web page
- URL or DOI: https://www.ifrs.org/content/dam/ifrs/publications/pdf-standards/english/2021/issued/part-a/conceptual-framework-for-financial-reporting.pdf
- Accessed: 2026-08-09
- Jurisdiction: IFRS reporting
- Supports: Recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure context affect how fundamentals are interpreted.
- Limitations: It does not endorse legacy coefficients, composite weights, or a market-wide rank.
Evidence boundary
Primary sources establish statement context, statistical conventions, or the historical source-model boundary. They do not certify the repository-authored weights, synthetic universe, current calibration, or issuer conclusion.
Full dependency-light reference implementations in both supported languages.
/** Canonical TypeScript parity implementation for D18-F09. */
type RecordLike = Record<string, any>;
const finite = (value: any, name: string): number => {
if (typeof value !== "number" || !Number.isFinite(value)) throw new TypeError(`${name} must be a finite number`);
return value;
};
const positive = (data: RecordLike, name: string): number => {
const value = finite(data[name], name);
if (value <= 0) throw new RangeError(`${name} must be positive`);
return value;
};
const nonnegative = (data: RecordLike, name: string): number => {
const value = finite(data[name], name);
if (value < 0) throw new RangeError(`${name} must be nonnegative`);
return value;
};
const isoDate = (value: any, name: string): string => {
if (typeof value !== "string" || !/^\d{4}-\d{2}-\d{2}$/.test(value)) throw new TypeError(`${name} must be YYYY-MM-DD`);
return value;
};
const clamp = (value: number, low = 0, high = 100): number => Math.max(low, Math.min(high, value));
const score = (data: RecordLike, name: string): number => {
const value = finite(data[name], name);
if (value < 0 || value > 100) throw new RangeError(`${name} must be between 0 and 100`);
return value;
};
const band = (value: number): string => value >= 75 ? "strong" : value >= 50 ? "watch" : "weak";
function assemble(data: RecordLike): RecordLike {
const cutoff = isoDate(data.knowledge_cutoff, "knowledge_cutoff");
const periodEnd = isoDate(data.period_end, "period_end");
if (typeof data.currency !== "string" || data.currency.length === 0) throw new TypeError("currency must be nonempty text");
if (typeof data.scale !== "string" || data.scale.length === 0) throw new TypeError("scale must be nonempty text");
if (!Array.isArray(data.required_fields) || data.required_fields.length === 0 || data.required_fields.some((x: any) => typeof x !== "string" || x.length === 0)) throw new TypeError("required_fields must be a nonempty string list");
if (!Array.isArray(data.facts)) throw new TypeError("facts must be a list");
const accepted: RecordLike = {};
const rejected: RecordLike[] = [];
for (const field of data.required_fields as string[]) {
const candidates = (data.facts as any[]).filter((fact: any) => fact && fact.field === field && typeof fact.value === "number" && Number.isFinite(fact.value) && typeof fact.available_at === "string" && typeof fact.period_end === "string" && fact.available_at <= cutoff && fact.period_end === periodEnd && fact.currency === data.currency && fact.scale === data.scale && fact.revision === "original");
if (candidates.length) {
candidates.sort((a: any, b: any) => a.available_at.localeCompare(b.available_at));
accepted[field] = candidates[candidates.length - 1].value;
} else rejected.push({ field, reason: "no original, aligned fact available by the knowledge cutoff" });
}
const completeness = Object.keys(accepted).length / data.required_fields.length;
return { state: completeness === 1 ? "ready" : "incomplete", method: "point-in-time-filing-fact-assembly", as_of: data.knowledge_cutoff, accepted_fields: Object.keys(accepted).sort(), selected_values: accepted, rejected_fields: rejected, completeness, ready: completeness === 1, clock_policy: "availability_at <= knowledge_cutoff; original revision; exact period/currency/scale" };
}
function cohort(data: RecordLike): RecordLike {
const asOf = isoDate(data.as_of, "as_of");
if (typeof data.target_id !== "string" || typeof data.target_sector !== "string" || typeof data.target_country !== "string") throw new TypeError("target identifiers and cohort dimensions must be text");
const minCap = nonnegative(data, "min_market_cap");
const minPeers = Math.trunc(positive(data, "min_peers"));
if (!Array.isArray(data.universe) || data.universe.length === 0) throw new TypeError("universe must be a nonempty list");
const target = (data.universe as any[]).find((row: any) => row && row.id === data.target_id);
if (!target) throw new RangeError("target_id must occur in universe");
const targetCap = positive(target, "market_cap");
const eligible: any[] = [];
const exclusions: RecordLike[] = [];
for (const row of data.universe as any[]) {
if (!row || row.id === data.target_id) continue;
let reason: string | null = null;
let cap = 0;
try { cap = positive(row, "market_cap"); isoDate(row.available_at, "universe.available_at"); } catch { reason = "invalid market-cap or availability fact"; }
if (!reason && row.available_at > asOf) reason = "not available at as-of date";
else if (!reason && row.listed !== true) reason = "not listed under the selected scope";
else if (!reason && row.sector !== data.target_sector) reason = "sector mismatch";
else if (!reason && row.country !== data.target_country) reason = "country mismatch";
else if (!reason && cap < minCap) reason = "below market-cap floor";
if (reason) exclusions.push({ id: String(row?.id ?? "?"), reason }); else eligible.push(row);
}
eligible.sort((a, b) => Math.abs(a.market_cap - targetCap) - Math.abs(b.market_cap - targetCap) || String(a.id).localeCompare(String(b.id)));
const ids = eligible.map(row => String(row.id));
return { state: ids.length >= minPeers ? "resolved" : "abstain", method: "point-in-time-sector-country-market-cap-cohort", as_of: data.as_of, eligible_ids: ids, cohort_count: ids.length, minimum_required: minPeers, coverage: ids.length / minPeers, exclusions, tie_break: "absolute market-cap distance, then stable entity id" };
}
function normalize(data: RecordLike): RecordLike {
if (!Array.isArray(data.metrics) || data.metrics.length === 0) throw new TypeError("metrics must be a nonempty list");
const minPeers = Math.trunc(positive(data, "min_peers"));
const results: RecordLike[] = [];
for (const metric of data.metrics as any[]) {
if (!metric || typeof metric.name !== "string" || !Array.isArray(metric.peers)) throw new TypeError("each metric needs name and peers");
const target = finite(metric.target, "target");
const peers = metric.peers.filter((value: any) => typeof value === "number" && Number.isFinite(value)) as number[];
if (peers.length < minPeers) throw new RangeError(`${metric.name} has fewer than min_peers observations`);
const equal = peers.filter(value => Math.abs(value - target) <= 1e-12).length;
const less = peers.filter(value => value < target - 1e-12).length;
const percentile = 100 * (less + 0.5 * equal) / peers.length;
if (typeof metric.higher_is_better !== "boolean") throw new TypeError(`${metric.name}.higher_is_better must be boolean`);
const normalized = metric.higher_is_better ? percentile : 100 - percentile;
results.push({ name: metric.name, target, peer_count: peers.length, percentile, higher_is_better: metric.higher_is_better, normalized_score: normalized });
}
const aggregate = results.reduce((sum, row) => sum + row.normalized_score, 0) / results.length;
return { state: "calculated", method: "midrank-empirical-percentile-with-direction", metrics: results, aggregate_score: aggregate, metric_count: results.length, invariant: "higher-is-better reverses the percentile only; peer values are not z-scored" };
}
const modelRules: Record<string, { population: string; eligible: (target: RecordLike) => boolean; variant: string }> = {
altman_z_original: { population: "public industrial manufacturer", eligible: t => t.is_public === true && t.sector === "industrial" && Number(t.market_cap) > 0, variant: "Use D18-F04-A01 original public-manufacturer coefficients" },
piotroski_f: { population: "non-financial issuer with two annual periods", eligible: t => !["bank", "insurance", "reit", "utility"].includes(t.sector) && Number(t.annual_periods) >= 2, variant: "Use D18-F04-A02 nine-signal contract" },
beneish_m: { population: "non-financial issuer with two annual periods", eligible: t => !["bank", "insurance", "reit", "utility"].includes(t.sector) && Number(t.annual_periods) >= 2, variant: "Use D18-F04-A03 eight-index contract" },
ohlson_o: { population: "industrial public research screen", eligible: t => t.is_public === true && Number(t.annual_periods) >= 2, variant: "Use D18-F04-A05 Model 1 convention" },
dividend_safety: { population: "issuer with declared dividend and cash-flow facts", eligible: t => t.dividends_known === true && Number(t.annual_periods) >= 1, variant: "Use D18-F09-A07 payout contract" },
balance_sheet_resilience: { population: "issuer with aligned balance-sheet and coverage facts", eligible: t => Number(t.total_assets) > 0 && ["US-GAAP", "IFRS"].includes(t.framework), variant: "Use D18-F09-A08 resilience contract" },
};
function route(data: RecordLike): RecordLike {
if (!data.target || typeof data.target !== "object" || !Array.isArray(data.requested_models) || data.requested_models.length === 0) throw new TypeError("target and requested_models are required");
const routes: RecordLike[] = [];
for (const model of data.requested_models as any[]) {
if (typeof model !== "string") throw new TypeError("requested model names must be text");
const rule = modelRules[model];
if (!rule) { routes.push({ model, status: "unsupported", variant: null, reason: "no frozen rule for this model label" }); continue; }
const eligible = rule.eligible(data.target);
routes.push({ model, status: eligible ? "eligible" : "reroute", variant: eligible ? rule.variant : null, population: rule.population, reason: eligible ? "all required scope facts pass" : `target does not meet ${rule.population} contract` });
}
const eligibleCount = routes.filter(row => row.status === "eligible").length;
return { state: eligibleCount ? "routed" : "abstain", method: "explicit-model-applicability-router", routes, eligible_count: eligibleCount, requested_count: routes.length, coverage: eligibleCount / routes.length };
}
function weighted(data: RecordLike, names: string[], weights: number[], output: string, method: string): RecordLike {
const values = names.map(name => score(data, name));
const components: RecordLike = {}, weightMap: RecordLike = {}, contributions: RecordLike = {};
names.forEach((name, i) => { components[name] = values[i]; weightMap[name] = weights[i]; contributions[name] = values[i] * weights[i]; });
const total = Object.values(contributions).reduce((sum: number, value: any) => sum + value, 0);
return { state: "calculated", method, components, weights: weightMap, contributions, [output]: total, band: band(total), coverage: 1 };
}
const health = (data: RecordLike): RecordLike => weighted(data, ["profitability_score", "cash_flow_score", "liquidity_score", "leverage_score"], [0.3, 0.3, 0.2, 0.2], "financial_health_score", "accounting-financial-health-weighted-composite");
const earnings = (data: RecordLike): RecordLike => weighted(data, ["accrual_quality_score", "cash_conversion_score", "revenue_quality_score", "manipulation_safety_score"], [0.3, 0.25, 0.25, 0.2], "earnings_quality_score", "earnings-quality-weighted-composite");
function dividend(data: RecordLike): RecordLike {
const dividends = positive(data, "dividends_paid");
const fcf = finite(data.free_cash_flow, "free_cash_flow");
const netIncome = finite(data.net_income, "net_income");
const interestCoverage = nonnegative(data, "interest_coverage");
const cash = nonnegative(data, "cash_and_equivalents");
const components = { free_cash_flow_coverage: clamp(fcf / dividends / 2 * 100), earnings_coverage: clamp(netIncome / dividends / 2 * 100), interest_coverage: clamp(interestCoverage / 10 * 100), cash_buffer: clamp(cash / dividends / 4 * 100) };
const weights = { free_cash_flow_coverage: 0.35, earnings_coverage: 0.25, interest_coverage: 0.2, cash_buffer: 0.2 };
const contributions: RecordLike = {}; Object.keys(components).forEach(key => { contributions[key] = (components as any)[key] * (weights as any)[key]; });
const value = Object.values(contributions).reduce((sum: number, item: any) => sum + item, 0);
return { state: "calculated", method: "coverage-and-liquidity-dividend-safety", components, weights, contributions, dividend_safety_score: value, band: band(value), coverage_policy: "coverage is capped at two times and cash buffer at four times" };
}
function resilience(data: RecordLike): RecordLike {
const currentAssets = positive(data, "current_assets"), currentLiabilities = positive(data, "current_liabilities"), totalDebt = positive(data, "total_debt"), ebitda = positive(data, "ebitda"), interest = positive(data, "interest_expense"), cash = nonnegative(data, "cash_and_equivalents"), due = nonnegative(data, "debt_due_12m");
if (due > totalDebt) throw new RangeError("debt_due_12m cannot exceed total_debt");
const components = { liquidity: clamp(currentAssets / currentLiabilities / 2 * 100), net_leverage: clamp((1 - (totalDebt - cash) / (4 * ebitda)) * 100), interest_coverage: clamp(ebitda / interest / 10 * 100), maturity_headroom: clamp((1 - due / totalDebt) * 100) };
const weights = { liquidity: 0.3, net_leverage: 0.3, interest_coverage: 0.25, maturity_headroom: 0.15 };
const contributions: RecordLike = {}; Object.keys(components).forEach(key => { contributions[key] = (components as any)[key] * (weights as any)[key]; });
const value = Object.values(contributions).reduce((sum: number, item: any) => sum + item, 0);
return { state: "calculated", method: "liquidity-leverage-coverage-maturity-resilience", components, weights, contributions, balance_sheet_resilience_score: value, band: band(value) };
}
function ensemble(data: RecordLike): RecordLike {
if (!Array.isArray(data.models) || data.models.length === 0) throw new TypeError("models must be a nonempty list");
const eligible: [string, number, number][] = [];
for (const model of data.models as any[]) {
if (!model || typeof model !== "object") throw new TypeError("each model must be an object");
if (model.eligible !== true) continue;
const probability = finite(model.distress_probability, "distress_probability"), weight = positive(model, "weight");
if (probability < 0 || probability > 1) throw new RangeError("distress_probability must be between zero and one");
eligible.push([String(model.name ?? "model"), probability, weight]);
}
if (!eligible.length) throw new RangeError("at least one eligible model is required");
const weightSum = eligible.reduce((sum, row) => sum + row[2], 0);
const probability = eligible.reduce((sum, row) => sum + row[1] * row[2], 0) / weightSum;
const variance = eligible.reduce((sum, row) => sum + row[2] * (row[1] - probability) ** 2, 0) / weightSum;
const values = eligible.map(row => row[1]), dispersion = Math.max(...values) - Math.min(...values);
return { state: "calculated", method: "weighted-distress-probability-ensemble", eligible_models: eligible.map(row => ({ name: row[0], probability: row[1], weight: row[2] })), model_count: eligible.length, distress_probability: probability, weighted_stddev: Math.sqrt(variance), disagreement_range: dispersion, agreement: 1 - dispersion, band: probability >= 0.66 ? "high-review" : probability >= 0.33 ? "watch" : "lower-review", calibration_boundary: "weighted aggregation preserves supplied probabilities; it does not recalibrate them" };
}
function conflict(data: RecordLike): RecordLike {
if (!Array.isArray(data.components) || data.components.length === 0) throw new TypeError("components must be a nonempty list");
const groupCap = finite(data.group_cap, "group_cap"), threshold = finite(data.conflict_threshold, "conflict_threshold");
if (groupCap <= 0 || groupCap > 1 || threshold <= 0 || threshold > 100) throw new RangeError("group_cap must be in (0,1] and conflict_threshold in (0,100]");
const groups = new Map<string, RecordLike[]>(); let rawWeight = 0, rawNumerator = 0;
for (const item of data.components as any[]) {
if (!item || typeof item.evidence_group !== "string") throw new TypeError("each component needs an evidence_group");
const value = score(item, "score"), weight = positive(item, "weight"), group = item.evidence_group;
if (!groups.has(group)) groups.set(group, []);
groups.get(group)!.push({ name: String(item.name ?? "component"), score: value, weight }); rawWeight += weight; rawNumerator += value * weight;
}
const adjusted: RecordLike[] = [], conflicts: string[] = []; let denominator = 0, numerator = 0;
[...groups.entries()].sort((a, b) => a[0].localeCompare(b[0])).forEach(([group, items]) => {
const weight = items.reduce((sum, item) => sum + item.weight, 0), mean = items.reduce((sum, item) => sum + item.score * item.weight, 0) / weight, values = items.map(item => item.score), range = Math.max(...values) - Math.min(...values), isConflict = range >= threshold, capped = Math.min(weight, groupCap);
if (isConflict) conflicts.push(group);
adjusted.push({ group, raw_weight: weight, capped_weight: capped, mean_score: mean, range, conflict: isConflict }); denominator += capped; numerator += capped * mean;
});
const resolved = numerator / denominator, raw = rawNumerator / rawWeight;
return { state: conflicts.length ? "conflict-detected" : "resolved", method: "evidence-group-cap-and-conflict-resolver", raw_score: raw, resolved_score: resolved, double_counting_adjustment: resolved - raw, groups: adjusted, conflict_groups: conflicts, conflict_count: conflicts.length, group_cap: groupCap, conflict_threshold: threshold };
}
const overall = (data: RecordLike): RecordLike => weighted(data, ["financial_health_score", "earnings_quality_score", "dividend_safety_score", "balance_sheet_resilience_score", "distress_safety_score", "valuation_score"], [0.24, 0.18, 0.14, 0.18, 0.16, 0.10], "overall_stock_score", "explainable-six-pillar-stock-score");
function confidence(data: RecordLike): RecordLike {
const baseScore = score(data, "base_score"), required = Math.trunc(positive(data, "required_components")), available = Math.trunc(nonnegative(data, "available_components")), maxConflicts = Math.trunc(positive(data, "max_conflicts")), conflicts = Math.trunc(nonnegative(data, "conflict_count")), minimum = Math.trunc(positive(data, "minimum_components")), staleDays = nonnegative(data, "stale_days");
if (available > required || conflicts > maxConflicts) throw new RangeError("available components or conflicts exceed their declared maxima");
const coverage = available / required, missingPenalty = 1 - coverage, stalenessPenalty = Math.min(staleDays / 365, 1) * 0.2, conflictPenalty = Math.min(conflicts / maxConflicts, 1) * 0.2, confidenceValue = coverage * (1 - stalenessPenalty) * (1 - conflictPenalty), adjusted = clamp(baseScore - 15 * missingPenalty - 10 * conflictPenalty), abstain = available < minimum || confidenceValue < 0.6;
return { state: abstain ? "abstain" : "usable-with-confidence", method: "coverage-staleness-conflict-confidence-gate", base_score: baseScore, coverage, missing_penalty: missingPenalty, staleness_penalty: stalenessPenalty, conflict_penalty: conflictPenalty, confidence: confidenceValue, adjusted_score: adjusted, abstain, reason: abstain ? "minimum component or confidence gate failed" : "coverage and confidence gates passed" };
}
function screen(data: RecordLike): RecordLike {
if (!Array.isArray(data.universe) || data.universe.length === 0) throw new TypeError("universe must be a nonempty list");
const floor = score(data, "screen_floor"), minConfidence = finite(data.min_confidence, "min_confidence"), minLiquidity = nonnegative(data, "min_liquidity");
if (minConfidence < 0 || minConfidence > 1) throw new RangeError("min_confidence must be between zero and one");
const selected: RecordLike[] = [], excluded: RecordLike[] = [];
for (const row of data.universe as any[]) {
if (!row || typeof row.id !== "string") throw new TypeError("each universe row needs an id");
const rowScore = score(row, "score"), confidenceValue = finite(row.confidence, "confidence"), liquidity = nonnegative(row, "liquidity");
if (confidenceValue < 0 || confidenceValue > 1) throw new RangeError("universe confidence must be between zero and one");
const reasons: string[] = []; if (row.eligible !== true) reasons.push("not eligible"); if (rowScore < floor) reasons.push("below score floor"); if (confidenceValue < minConfidence) reasons.push("below confidence floor"); if (liquidity < minLiquidity) reasons.push("below liquidity floor");
const candidate: RecordLike = { id: row.id, score: rowScore, confidence: confidenceValue, liquidity, sector: row.sector ?? "unspecified" };
if (reasons.length) excluded.push({ ...candidate, reasons }); else selected.push(candidate);
}
selected.sort((a, b) => b.score - a.score || b.confidence - a.confidence || a.id.localeCompare(b.id));
const ranked = selected.map((row, index) => ({ rank: index + 1, ...row }));
return { state: selected.length ? "ranked" : "abstain", method: "eligibility-confidence-score-floor-ranking", ranked, screened_count: ranked.length, universe_count: data.universe.length, coverage: ranked.length / data.universe.length, score_floor: floor, confidence_floor: minConfidence, liquidity_floor: minLiquidity, excluded, tie_break: "score descending, confidence descending, stable id ascending" };
}
function history(data: RecordLike): RecordLike {
if (!Array.isArray(data.history) || data.history.length < 2) throw new RangeError("history needs at least two points");
const rows = (data.history as any[]).map(row => { if (!row || typeof row.components !== "object") throw new TypeError("each history row needs components"); return { date: isoDate(row.as_of, "history.as_of"), row }; });
for (let index = 0; index + 1 < rows.length; index += 1) if (rows[index].date >= rows[index + 1].date) throw new RangeError("history must be strictly chronological");
const previous = rows[rows.length - 2].row, latest = rows[rows.length - 1].row, previousScore = score(previous, "overall_score"), latestScore = score(latest, "overall_score");
const keys = [...new Set([...Object.keys(previous.components), ...Object.keys(latest.components)])].sort();
const deltas: RecordLike = {}; for (const key of keys) deltas[key] = score(latest.components, key) - score(previous.components, key);
const topDriver = keys.reduce((best, key) => Math.abs(deltas[key]) > Math.abs(deltas[best]) || (Math.abs(deltas[key]) === Math.abs(deltas[best]) && key > best) ? key : best, keys[0]);
const delta = latestScore - previousScore, priorBand = String(previous.band), latestBand = String(latest.band), migration = priorBand === latestBand ? "unchanged" : `${priorBand} -> ${latestBand}`, order: Record<string, number> = { abstain: 0, watch: 1, eligible: 2, strong: 3 };
return { state: delta > 1e-12 ? "improved" : delta < -1e-12 ? "deteriorated" : "unchanged", method: "point-in-time-score-history-change-attribution", previous_as_of: previous.as_of, latest_as_of: latest.as_of, previous_score: previousScore, latest_score: latestScore, score_change: delta, prior_band: priorBand, latest_band: latestBand, migration, migration_direction: (order[latestBand] ?? 0) - (order[priorBand] ?? 0), component_deltas: deltas, top_driver: topDriver, clock_policy: "only knowledge-available snapshots are comparable" };
}
export function calculate(topicId: string, data: RecordLike): RecordLike {
const functions: Record<string, (input: RecordLike) => RecordLike> = { "D18-F09-A01": assemble, "D18-F09-A02": cohort, "D18-F09-A03": normalize, "D18-F09-A04": route, "D18-F09-A05": health, "D18-F09-A06": earnings, "D18-F09-A07": dividend, "D18-F09-A08": resilience, "D18-F09-A09": ensemble, "D18-F09-A10": conflict, "D18-F09-A11": overall, "D18-F09-A12": confidence, "D18-F09-A13": screen, "D18-F09-A14": history };
if (!functions[topicId]) throw new RangeError(`unsupported topic id: ${topicId}`);
return functions[topicId](data);
}
The embedded lab now expands to its full document height, keeping the article as the only scroll surface.