Definitions
In plain terms
Changing an earlier record changes later computed commitments when the selected bytes and linking rules are checked.
Technical
D30 hashes an explicitly encoded, scoped sequence; verification needs the expected head, complete selected prefix and unchanged byte rules.
Scope
A self-consistent replacement chain is possible if the attacker also replaces the only trusted head.
Examples
- A synthetic one-byte journal edit fails comparison with the separately retained original chain head.
Common misconceptions
- A valid local chain does not prove source completeness or legitimate transactions.
Concept relationships
Prerequisites
Where this concept is used
Evidence and governance
- FIPS 180-4, Secure Hash Standard, August 2015 National Institute of Standards and Technology · official standard
Supports: preferred label, short definition, variant distinction
Limits: Does not specify the D30 chain encoding, trusted head, ledger completeness or authenticity; revision planning is noted by NIST.
- D30 glossary teaching-profile scope, Batch 013 The Fintech Builder · internal governed contract
Supports: technical definition
Limits: No independent regulatory mandate, real-bank dataset, service execution, external witness or production assurance is claimed.
- Reviewed by
- fintech-builder-batch-013
- Last reviewed
- 2026-10-27
- Next review
- 2027-10-27
- Record status
- evidence reviewed
This record is evidence-reviewed and readable, but not yet promoted to published — it is served noindex,follow and excluded from the sitemap.
